![]() |
| [Photo of Jesse Jackson, Jr. from wikipedia] |
Friday, August 16, 2013
Former Congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr. Sentenced to Federal Prison
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
A Goolsby "War Story:" More Examples of Kickbacks in Fraud Cases
![]() |
| [Depiction of Cash from wikipedia] |
One example of the many kickbacks, or rewards, paid in this case included payments for the other company's employee to purchase TWO vacation homes. In short, the construction company paid money toward his purchase of an $800,000 log cabin at a Minnesota lake and another $150,000 for the employee to purchase a condo at an exclusive winter ski resort in Whistler, British Columbia.
Of course, in return, the employee of the other company "scratched the back" of the construction company president by approving millions of dollars in construction projects.
Monday, August 27, 2012
A Goolsby "War Story:" The Most Interesting Kickbacks Ever!
Sunday, September 4, 2011
Just Another Typical Investment Fraud and Ponzi Scheme
![]() |
[Photo from socyberty.com] |
Friday, June 24, 2011
Don Lepre, Fraud, and Lessons About Missing Court
| [Photo from dailymail.co.uk] |
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
Former Illinois Congressman Dan Rostenkowski Passes Away

Sunday, September 27, 2009
The Supreme Court and "Honest Services" Mail Fraud

At some point during the next year, the United States Supreme Court is expected, for the first time, to grapple with the issue of what constitutes "honest services" mail fraud. In May, 2009, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the appeal by a business man of his conviction under the statute. (Black v. United States). His defense attorneys claim the statute is too vague.
In 1988, Congress enacted this statute, (18 U.S.C. 1346), which essentially makes it a federal crime for either a politician or a business executive to use the mails in furtherance of a scheme to "deprive another of their intangible right to [the politician's, or business executive's] honest services.
The "honest services" mail fraud statute is a popular prosecutorial tool used by federal prosecutors everywhere! As a former federal prosecutor, I often utilized this statute to charge corruption cases, too!
Frankly, it is easier to see what this "honest services" statute means when it is applied in the public sector, i.e. to politicians. For example, it is clear to see that a politican has deprived the public of their right to his "honest services" when he uses his public office for private gain and secretly lines his pockets with money. Whether or not he is guilty or innocent, that is the type of case which former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich faces.
But applying the "honest services" statute to the private (business) sector presents some tougher questions about what the mail fraud statute really means. The issue in the pending appeal before the Supreme Court involves trickier questions about whether the statute, (and the meaning of "honest services"), is too vague, including issues about how far does the statute go in criminalizing business deals, and does it criminalize mere ethical violations. It also raises questions about to whom does a business executive owe a duty of "honest services," and is that duty based upon state or federal law? In other words, the Supreme Court must decide, in this new case, whether or not the "honest services" mail fraud statute is too vague, because it fails to give adequate notice to the average person as to what constitutes a crime.
Just as you never know what a jury will do, you also can never fully guess what the Supreme Court may do! But it will be interesting to see what happens! And I suspect former Governor Blagojevich and his defense attorneys will be watching, too!
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud

Do you know how the feds really catch white collar criminals and how the cases are often charged in federal court? The answer lies in the use of the U.S. mail by white collar criminals.
Years ago, Congress made it a federal crime, (in 18 U.S.C. 1341), to use the U.S. mail to help further a fraudulent scheme. This federal crime is known as mail fraud. Thus, any time someone sends a fraudulent solicitation or bogus claim in the mail, they may have violated the federal mail fraud statute. In addition, Congress also made wire fraud, (18 U.S.C. 1343), a federal crime. Therefore, any time a con artist makes a telephone call or uses the internet in furtherance of his scam, he has likewise violated federal law and may be visited by an F.B.I. agent.
And don't think you can get away with your crime simply by sending your bogus claims via federal express. Congress also included use of common carriers in the mail fraud statute, too! So, maybe you should just use "donkey mail," if you want to avoid a date in federal court!




